Liberalis Moronis

Archaeologists have uncovered what they believe to be the first liberal, judging by the DNA profile it is between 200,000 and 250,000 years old. It appears to be a sub-species of Neanderthal man, scientists have dubbed as Homo Liberalis Moronis. Thought to be extinct hundreds of thousands of years ago, recent research in genome types have lead researchers to believe that there are many direct descendents still living.

They were initially thought to be hard to spot, researchers have compiled a list of the more obvious traits you can use to identify Liberalis Moronis.

Low I.Q.
Inability to think or act as individuals
Unnatural sexual habits
Strange affinity for shiny objects
Unexplained fear of any form of self defense
Innate ability to ignore the obvious

The most modern descendents can also be identified through their constant and repetitious use of garbled phrases such as obama, hillary, gun control, christians, conservatives, microaggression, etc… Other common words you can identify them with are any of the isms, such as racism, sexism and so on, they create isms at an astounding rate.

If you do identify one of these Liberalis Moronis, do not approach them directly at any time with factual information, it can cause them to become verbally abusive and possibly even go into convulsions, physically and mentally. If you find yourself in this position just use the phrase “social justice”, it puts them in a catatonic state that allows them to be lead about easily.

He Killed a Triceratops!

Did you hear about the college professor (joyce carol oates) that is mad at Steven Spielberg for killing and posing with a Triceratops (dinosaur). I guess I can’t blame her, everyone knows that if you are going to hunt dinosaurs, it is more accepted to hunt the more common mono-ceratops or even the duo-ceratops but not the rare tri-ceratops. I think it’s catch and release on the rare ones.

Spielberg with his kill…

Where is my White Privilege?

Where is my White Privilege, or is it a pigment of my Imagination?

I want to know where I sign up for my white privilege, I sure could use the extra help right now. I am out of work on comp after getting hurt on the job. Is there a list of extra benefits due to me as a white person, or do I just develop an entitlement attitude like many in the black community have, and my white privilege will kick in? I wish I had known back in the sixties about my white privilege, I could have used it to stop my parents from getting a divorce. That would have allowed me a better opportunity to grow and develop as a normal child. It might have prevented me from stuttering every other word from the time I started talking until I was in my mid-thirties.

Or I could have engaged it in the mid-seventies to avoid committing criminal acts and ending up in a N.Y. State juvenile facility. Or a couple years later when I quit school and went to work at 16 years old. I could have used that white privilege to get a decent job, instead I worked as a bus boy and a dishwasher. If I would have had a father growing up, he could have instructed me on the proper use of my “whitpriv” my “caucasian persuasion”, my “pigment present”.

Apparently they are teaching the kids in school about white privilege now, I could have used some lessons, it might have helped me later to sidestep the drug and alcohol issues that I experienced. But then again if I had known how to use it I would have missed out on the joys I experienced in the many wonderful jobs I had over time. Jobs such as shoveling horse shit all day, or baling hay, pumping gas, picking vegetables (yes just like a migrant worker), dishwasher again, delivery person (both pizza and parts). I guess my privilege kicked in a little as I got older because I was able to get some really high quality employment then, construction laborer, bathroom and toilet cleaner, the pinnacle of success was my job answering phones all day (getting yelled at by rich people) for just over minimum wage.

The white privilege people say that because I can turn on the television or open the front page to the newspaper and see my my race widely represented, that is proof right there of it’s existence. And I thought it was because my race is the majority population, where is my common sense? Another clear indicator according to the race patrol, is the fact that I can arrange to be in the company of my own race most of the time. The majority of black people chose to live in black neighborhoods, does that give them black privilege? Most people tend to gravitate to areas with people they can identify with, by race, national origin, political agenda and even socioeconomic class. So if black or latino people want to live around other black or latino people it’s normal, but if white people want to, it’s racist.

It pisses me off to find out now in my mid fifties that I could have avoided growing up in poverty and having all of those negative life experiences, had I just engaged my “white privilege”. And apparently I lost my white privilege or it  had an expiration date on it, now that I am aware of it, I looked all over for it and it’s no place to be found. I’m thinking about putting posters up around the neighborhood, with all of the white people around some one must have seen it, hopefully it will be returned unopened and in good working order. I could really use it about now, living under the poverty level like I do.

And then there are the highly respected left wing nut jobs at the “white privilege” conference, we can’t rule out their highly evolved and advanced skill levels at rooting out white privilege in even the darkest corners of society. Fortunately they were able to make us aware of the excessive use of white privilege by Tea Party members. Who they described as having forms of racism ranging from “sort of generic to bald-faced racism”, is bald faced racism something clean shaven men practice?

According to the speaker there the Tea Party doesn’t really support “All this business about government and ‘constitutional’ it is a smokescreen that’s really all about, ‘I want this country back for me.’ And ‘me’ meaning ‘white people’. He even elaborated further on his brilliant summation by “noting that tea party supporters do not like to be called racists, the leftist activist suggested that tea party advocates mostly don’t like obama because obama “broke the white monopoly on the presidency.” Dam how did he figure out the true reason some white people don’t like obama, he broke our perfect record on old white men as president, we were trying for an even fifty. We are starting all over, it’s gonna take us another 200 years now.

And don’t forget the brain trusts he has involved in the question and answer period,a woman asked: “What is, like, an African-American tea party member? How could there be one?”

He said he doesn’t know “how people could do it” but compared black people who support limited government and gun rights to “Jewish kluxers.”

The speaker repeatedly referred to black people as “black folks.” He bizarrely suggested that “black folks” didn’t know about the tea party movement when it began because it wasn’t a topic of discussion “at the barber shop.” He also adamantly suggested that there are “no gay people in the tea party,” and that constitutional government and a free-market economy cannot coexist.

At the beginning of his talk, he had asked audience members to volunteer to speak about themselves.

“I live in the bowels of the tea party, and I have the privilege of teaching your children,” explained one White Privilege Conference attendee — a woman with a Southern accent. I am glad she went into such detail and really explained her position, we can really see where she is coming from and her true concerns.

“I teach at a very elite boarding school,” explained a second woman who said she is from the Boston area. She said the school is “full of tea partiers” who “try to, you know baptize” political opponents. This really surprises me, she happens to teach at the only elite boarding school in all of New England that is not totally liberal, what are the odds of that? And I think I have heard of the baptizing antics of the “Boston Family” of the tea party, run by “whitey”, they outfitted their enemies with rubber shoes didn’t they?

A third woman, from Minnesota, lamented that the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party is moving “towards what they call the middle” and becoming “welcoming to the needs of independent voters.” As the woman trailed off after “independent voters,” he interjected “…which means tea party,” as a way to label such voters.

A fourth woman said she attended his lecture because her “in-laws get all their news from Fox.” Michael J. Fox is not all that informative, but I guess she has her reasons. Oh, wait, I think she might mean Fox News Channel. I guess the channel her in-laws watch is as good a reason as any to be concerned about white privilege.

At least I think the lecture was about white privilege, it almost sounded more like a bash the tea Party lecture, maybe he was trying to multi-mask…

Obama Kool Aid

You really have to watch what you do sometimes, I dropped my pocket, and before I could grab it my frickin unicorn ate it. I normally wouldn’t care, but I had 10 packs of obama kool-aid in that pocket, liberals would have paid a lot to get their hands on hallucinogenics like that. They will give a year of reality for just a gram of that shit!

Clueless Classes of Millennial Masses

You might have read the story about Columbia Law School letting it’s students postpone exams, the reason is really hard to believe. Because of the personal trauma experienced by the students due to the Grand Jury decisions in both the Brown and Garner cases. Georgetown University Law Center and Harvard Law School have jumped on the band wagon with Columbia, because we have clueless classes full of millennial masses.

William Desmond, one of the editors of the Harvard Law Review, wrote in The National Law Journal in defense of the request, titled “Delaying Exams is not a request from Coddled Millennials.”  As an adult that is exactly what I would call it, an excuse for coddled millennials. He is concerned for “students who have been confronting the aftermath of the recent failed grand jury indictments of the officers who killed the unarmed black men.” He doesn’t bother to explain in what way the grand juries failed, that is how our young people are taught today though, facts should not get in the way of your emotional decisions, they just clutter up your mind. Keep in mind these students are in law school, not liberal arts or gender studies program.

I have to question the type of lawyers these students will be, if as William Desmond says “over the last few weeks many law students have experienced moments of total despair, minutes of inconsolable tears and hours of utter confusion.”  He further continues by stating “I have seen the psychological trauma brought on by disillusionment with our justice system send some law students into a period of depression. After all, every death of an unarmed youth at the hands of law enforcement is a tragedy.”

Where is the concern from these millennials about all of the deaths of unarmed youth at the hands of gangbangers, drug dealers and criminals in places like Chicago, New York or Los Angeles. The number of those deaths pales in comparison to those statistics. I guess the leftist agenda is already well established in these students, so those lives have no value because they were not at the hands of law enforcement, thus no political or social justice value. As a black male I would think Mr. Desmond would be more concerned with those numbers. I would guess after four years at Yale and three at Harvard, he came from money or has seen a lot of affirmative action. Either way, after seven years in the ivory towers I am sure he is well insulated from a life on the streets.

To me the whole article is just a list of excuses, and a good example of the quality of people our education system is indoctrinating. Click the link above to read the whole article.

 

I’m Offended Because…(fill in the blank)

What the f**k is wrong with America? People can’t say anything anymore without some f**kin moron being offended. Believe me I think hell should have a special section set aside for teacher union presidents. But I mean come on people, she made an analogy:

“I have filed several complaints for teachers who have been screamed at, pushed and intimidated so badly that it reminds me of the ‘cotton fields’ of the past,” Moore wrote in the email.

In a since-sent apology email, Moore wrote that she “never meant to downplay the atrocities from the years of slavery in this county.”

Were slaves the only ones who ever picked cotton in America, did the cotton just pick itself once slavery ended? So the cotton has magically picked itself for 150 years now, I never did it, but I have friends (white friends) that picked cotton in their youth.

People have gotten out of hand any more, some times it’s ok to tell people to just STFU, you meant nothing by it, if they are offended it’s on them, it’s their problem for looking for something to be offended by in everything.

Here is the article I am referencing: http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/05/teachers-union-president-sorry-for-comparing-teaching-to-picking-cotton/

Oliver Twist(ed) Friedfeld’s Story!

Bad Language Warning: Because this pisses me the fuck off beyond belief! I couldn’t believe this was a real story at first!

What the fuck is wrong with this Oliver Twist(ed) Friedfeld moron? And he may be part of our government someday. Though the government is already filled with the same level of stupidity exhibited by this Oliver Twist(ed) fool. He deserved to get robbed because of his privilege, he says he believes that those with privilege should just adapt to crime. This time his assailants were not violent, what of the many who are mugged and beaten, or raped, stabbed or shot in the commission of a crime of this nature? What the fuck is wrong with this guy?

Not once did he consider their attackers to be bad people. “They wanted my stuff, not me. While I don’t know what exactly they needed the money for, I do know that I’ve never once had to think about going out on a Saturday night to mug people. I had never before seen a gun, let alone known where to get one.” I don’t know who or what decides who is privileged or not privileged or at what level privilege kicks in. But it is quite clear that this individual is completely clueless to the reality that many of us live, and the sorrow and pain many families experience because violent crime has taken a loved one away from them.

He can hardly blame his assailants because of income inequality, and some bullshit of otherization. They were two criminals that robbed him and his room mate at gunpoint. But it’s not their fault that they are the garbage of society, it’s the wrongs of the past, according to Oliver Twist(ed). He doesn’t, like all liberal morons mention any specific wrongs of the past that need addressing. But these wrongs are clearly having an effect on these poor gun toting young men of high moral fiber, who’s investment in the local crack house did not pay off with any dividends this quarter. Thus forcing them to create a temporary level of privilege for themselves, based on someone else’s hard work and effort.

Apparently this Oliver twist-ed has wealthy parents or family, this has allowed  him to live a life of privilege. One that has afforded him all the comforts of life, and an education most can only dream of. An education that clearly has taught him nothing of the real world, yet through the School of Foreign Service he may someday be a member of the State Department, possibly in control of important decisions concerning our country. I have to assume that it is his privilege that has gotten him to this point in his life, it certainly is not his grasp on reality, he has none. I am guessing he has never gotten off of his over privileged ass and done a day of work in his life, he clearly has no idea that someone in his family had to earn the money that he is coasting through life on.

He trots out the old income inequality excuse for the two scumbags that robbed him.  How fucking clueless is this guy? Who makes excuses for the criminal, especially criminals that commit armed robbery. This just really pisses me off, what kind of schools and teachers do we have in our country at all levels of the education system if we are turning out complete morons and idiots like this. Someone could have been injured or even died during the robbery if things had gone differently.

This is a big part of what is wrong with America, we have people telling us that all white people are racists because of privilege (white privilege), just by virtue of birth. We have liberals like this idiot Oliver twist-ed telling us that some people because of their social and or financial privilege should not expect to have the same protections or rights the Constitution and the Bill of Rights guarantees the rest of us. Even more disturbing is the idea that criminals are not responsible for their own behavior, but some perceived wrong from the past is the real culprit. So we should do what? Grant to the criminal element in our society special rights to make them a privileged class, based on some yet unstated past wrongs the liberals all agree exist yet cannot to this day ever seem to make an actual list of.

I know this sounds totally ridiculous and insane, but to me this whole story from Oliver twist-ed sounds that way. After reading it multiple times I still can’t grasp that this is a true story, it sounds like a script for a TV show more then reality. The worst part of it all is there are way to many clueless liberals and morons in our society, that don’t seem to grasp reality. If you try to rob me at gun point or break into my house I am going to shoot you, plain and fucking simple, that is all the reality you need to grasp. You won’t be the first one to take a shot at me, but I will do my best to make sure it is your last shot, ever. How do you expect someone to respond if you are threatening their life or their family?

I still cannot grasp the reality here, that reality being where our country and society are headed. It’s not even about the number of people that have fallen victim to the liberal garbage corrupting our society. It’s the fact that they can spread this garbage so easily through their control of the education system, both primary and secondary. That is what is making their agenda so effective is the total control, common core is an extension of that agenda. Why do you think they (the liberals and democrats) are pushing so hard for universal preschool, an earlier start to the indoctrination of our children. How do you think the system is turning out morons that believe they deserved to be a victim.

Why do you think common core and total control is so important to them. They know with time and control of the circumstances they can eventually teach kids to give up their Constitutional Rights and Freedoms voluntarily, without a fight or shot ever being fired. This may seem like a story of just another clueless moron not grasping the reality many of us face in life. But look at the underlying cause and effect that the education system probably played here.

And yes privilege did and does play a role here, but not in the manor you think. Many of the people that end up running our country and our government, come from families of wealth and privilege. Many of these people already have a distorted sense of reality because of their life of privilege and how it shelters them from a normal daily life in America. If they can influence the future leaders and people in government, it is a much smaller group that they need to focus on. With exclusive and Ivy League schools attended primarily by the people they most wish to influence, consider where this could eventually lead us. And see why they need these schools to be the bastions of liberalism they have become.

Consider what we can learn from this story, as fucked up as it is.

Baseline Budgeting; Washington’s Bait and Switch

The beginning of the article gives you some background on how we came to have our current budget process, leading up to the advent of baseline budgeting. You can skip the history if you like, scroll to where it says “Baseline Budgeting” and start reading from there.

Negotiating in good faith for the people.

How many of you have ever heard of Baseline Budgeting? It’s an accounting method the U.S. Government uses in a kind of a bait and switch move. It’s used primarily by the democrats, the republicans have tried to point out it’s use. It gives the democrats propaganda they can use with the voters back home. It allows them to claim they implemented or helped to implement budget cuts to benefit everyone.

Before the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921was passed, there were many departments in the Executive and Legislative branches of government that all had individual budgets that needed to be passed. The main objective of the bill was to consolidate the budgets of those departments in both branches into a single government budget. The act also created the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), their purpose was to facilitate the consolidation of multiple departmental budgets among both branches. They also assist the President in assembling the budget for presentation to and consideration by Congress.

Just as the act created the OMB in the Executive Branch, it also created the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in the Legislative Branch. It’s main purpose was to be a non-partisan audit, evaluation and investigative unit for Congress. It fulfilled part of it’s mission by submitting to Congress, upon request, reports detailing the specific costs of government programs or bills brought before Congress. They also supply annual reports on the financial condition of the government.

No real significant changes came about in the budget process until they passed the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974. The passage of this act was necessitated due to actions taken by then President Richard M. Nixon, who with held nearly 12 million dollars in funds already appropriated by Congress. The main purpose in passing this act was to give Congress a stronger and more central role in the budget process. With a secondary purpose of reducing the Presidents impoundment authority, the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921placed to much power over the budget process in the hands of the President.

The side effect of the 1974 act, was to set the stage for eventual baseline budgeting. It required the OMB to set projections of federal spending for the next fiscal year. Section II of the act also created the Congressional Budget office (CBO), it also brought about the creation of separate house and senate budget committees. The CBO was tasked with giving 5 year budget projections, which has now been extended out to 10 years.

Baseline Budgeting

Initially they start the budget process with a baseline budget, which is the budget of the current fiscal year as a starting point, with out any new legislation or spending added.

I will use the Department of Education for my example. The current budget for that department is 78 billion (real number unfortunately), the democrats will propose to hike the budget by 10%, knowing they actually want a 7% budget increase. The bill they propose will have the 10% increase in it.

Publicly and in the media they (the democrats) will boast about how they need the increased funding because they care so much about the children and education. If the republicans can’t see that, they must want to deprive the children, especially low income (liberal keyword for minorities) children from receiving a proper education.

They put up a fight over the 10% increase (with insults flying of course), but in the end they settle for a 7% increase. Now this is where the story gets interesting, because they tell the voters back home that they fought for their children and got a 7% increase for education. And, at the same time will say they are working to keep the deficit under control by cutting 3% from it. What they are not saying is they did not cut a dime. They still have an increase overall from last years budget. They cut the percentage of the increase, not the actual budget, that is the basis of baseline budgeting and politics.

They don’t actual cut the budget, they cut the percentage of the increase to the budget. So what happens is the original figure of 78 billion is increased by 5.46 billion to 83.46 billion. Then the following year the baseline budget for the Department of education will be 83.46 billion, and it starts all over again.

The Fine Print on the Race Card: Part 3 – Assimilate From the Outside

I am changing it up from here, my part 3 was going to be totally different then this post is going to be, and I had planned a part 4 also. I was trying to bring the subject to everyone from kinda different angle for multiple reasons. I don’t believe I am or can do proper justice to the subject of race relations in American using the style I was. So as I said, I’m changing it up, so here goes.

*All links in the article below open in a new window.

The Fine Print on the Race Card: Part 3 – Assimilate From the Outside

The title “Assimilate From the Outside” is in reference to what was the reality for most of the black community from the time they were freed, until recent times, starting in the sixties. They were on the outside looking in, expected to assimilate without being accepted. Having no real representation in government, on all levels, local, state and federal, denied them many opportunities. Winning the right to vote in 1870 was not the boon it was expected to be for the black community. Due to laws that were passed, along with poll taxes and literacy tests, they were still denied the right to vote. It wasn’t until several measures combined to give them the rights and protections they needed.

In 1964 the 24th Amendment (to the Constitution) was ratified, prohibiting poll taxes on federal elections. This amendment, combined with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which had language similar to that of the 15th Amendment (to the Constitution). Applied a nationwide prohibition against the denial or abridgment of the right to vote on the literacy tests on a nationwide basis. Add the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of “Harper v. Virginia State Board of Election” in 1966, which found that Virginia’s poll tax was illegal. Virginia, along with four other states still had a poll tax in place at the time. Though not perfect, some thought these measure did not go far enough, others thought they went to far (as in section 5).

As an outsider making a casual observation, it appears to me that they (the black community) are getting no return on their investment/vote. One hundred years ago the majority of blacks that were voting were voting republican, this was because the republicans were the party that supported the 13th Amendment (emancipation) and black politicians during the reconstruction era in America. The shift away from the republican party really started with the depression, FDR’s “New Deal” started the transition and by 1960 about 2/3 of the black electorate had become democrats.

In 1964 the republican nominee for president, Barry Goldwater, was labeled an extremist because of the belief that he did not support the Civil rights Act, or the Civil Rights Movement in general. This pushed a large portion of the remaining blacks in the republican party over to the democrats. His stance on limited government and states rights, which was very similar to the Tea Party of today, was the death knell for black support of the republican party which continues to this day. LBJ signed the Civil Rights Act into law less then 2 weeks before the 1964 republican convention. At this point approximately 90% of black voters had migrated to the democratic party.

Part of LBJ’s (Lyndon Baines Johnson) legacy still lives with us today. His “Great Society” and “War on Poverty” brought about programs such as:

• The Food Stamp Act of 1964
• The Social Security Amendments of 1965, this expanded on the Social Security Act signed by FDR in 1935 and created Medicare and Medicaid.
• Job Corps Program
• Teacher Corps
• Head Start Program
• National Endowment for the Arts
• National Endowment for the Humanities
• Corporation for Public Broadcasting – Public Television
• National Public Radio – NPR

These are just some of the programs started under the banner of “The war on Poverty”, not all of these programs were bad for our society. Many in fact were a benefit and did address important issues of the day. It is what many of these programs became over time, and the end result that is a concern.

Thomas Sowell, a black conservative argues (and rightfully so) that the Great Society programs only contributed to the destruction of African American families, saying “the black family, which had survived centuries of slavery and discrimination, began rapidly disintegrating in the liberal welfare state that subsidized unwed pregnancy and changed welfare from an emergency rescue to a way of life.”

Next: The Fine Print on the Race Card: Part 4 – Unintended Consequences

Not Real Informative

I was trolling some democrat websites today out of curiosity. I was totally surprised at what I found, or should I say what I did not find, that was some facts. Now I am not a republican or a democrat, I am a registered independent, and always will be. I have to give the republican leaning websites credit at least. They normally present facts and many even list sources for you to check out for yourself.

The democrat leaning websites seem to based on one thing alone. Bash republicans, and then call them liars and scum. There were no facts presented, no issues brought up except for climate change and the republican “war on women”. No facts were presented on climate change or the “war on women” either, but they seem to be a central theme on many of these websites.

One website even said that if the republicans win both the house and senate that we would have gridlock unlike any time in our history and nothing would get done. What we have right now is pretty much gridlock in a way, with the dems controlling the senate and the repubs having the house. So I have to think this democrat leaning website does not really understand what gridlock is all about. I don’t even want to get into approximate 350 bills that harry reid has sitting on his desk, many passed with a bipartisan vote in the house.

Of those bills:

• 98% passed with bipartisan support
• close to 70% passed with a 2/3 margin or more
• over 50% passed with no opposition at all
• 55 of those bills were introduced by democrats

We have had gridlock on certain issues, especially budget issues, but you can see that the house has worked together in many instances. But harry reid has not even allowed many of these bills to even come up for a vote, I would guess because he was either concerned that they would pass, he owes special interests favors, or control issues.