Some Black Lives Matter!

I am sure by now everyone in America has heard about the ignorance of these protestors for the “black lives matter” group. The main stream media has made sure that they have coverage of these protestors interrupting a political rally for both Bernie Sanders and Jeb Bush. The message they have for the candidates for president in 2016 is ” that they want police violence and racial disparities in policing to be acknowledged and addressed “. They supposedly wanted to disrupt a campaign event held on Tuesday in New Hampshire for Hillary Clinton, they arrived too late to gain entrance to the event they stated, though they did meet with the candidate after the event.

I would be more willing to believe that they were not allowed entrance to the event by mutual agreement beforehand, the reason for their denial into the event was room capacity had been reached. They even went as far as having the Secret Service verify that as being the reason, the fact that they went to those lengths to point it out throws doubt on it in my opinion. They were allowed to meet with the candidate afterwards in what was referred to as an overflow room. The media was not allowed to record the meeting, which is strange also, because both sides would have wanted to take advantage of the controlled situation and try to score some points with the media and the public. I believe everything was scripted here to obtain the maximum exposure while releasing the minimum amount of information.
You can read the full article here concerning their meeting: Hillary and Black Lives Matter activists meet in private.

A spokesperson/activist from Black Lives Matter told the press later “We asked the secretary about her and her family’s history with the war on drugs both at home and abroad and how she felt about her involvement in that violence that has been perpetuated, especially against communities of color and against black folks.” Yancey, the spokesperson for Black Lives Matter, added that she never heard “a reflection on her part in perpetuating white supremacist violence.”

Another clear reason a candidate would want the meeting reported in the news media, they would want to address allegations like those immediately and decisively in a public forum.
Black Lives Matter, at that point accused Hillary of ” involvement in the violence that has been perpetuated, especially against communities of color and against black folks.”  They also appear to have labeled her as ” perpetuating white supremacist violence.”

You see, if Hillary Clinton doesn’t address the statement made by Black Lives Matter, both sides win. Black Lives Matter wins, because they are seen as asking the tough no holds barred questions of the candidate. And Hillary wins because by not addressing it publicly, she appears to accept her role in these supposed crimes against the black community, her silence also helps her to appear repentant in the matter. As I stated above, I am more inclined to believe that the whole thing was scripted from start to finish, this allowed both parties to project a certain image in the situation. Yet if you notice, there was no information released by either side that has any basis in reality, such as specifics concerning violence by police, or incarceration rates for young black males. If nothing is presented, nothing can be questioned or fact checked.

I veered some from my original intentions of the article when I realized that something was wrong as reported. Under normal circumstances both Hillary (as a presidential candidate) and the Black Lives Matter group would have been fighting for press time and to score some political points.

In the next post I will cover the issues presented by the tactics and strategy  of the group Black Lives Matter.

Jade Helm, just an Exercise?

Most of us are aware of the Jade Helm exercises that are going to be happening starting July 15 and running until September 15. For those of you that are unaware, it is a joint effort with the Green Berets, Navy Seals, the 82nd Airborne Division, USAF Special Operations Command, USMC Special Operations Command and expeditionary units each participating in the exercise. The exercise will cover Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah and Colorado, with Texas and Utah being designated as “hostile territory” and New Mexico leaning towards hostile.

Jade Helm Operating Area

Is this just a training exercise or something more, that depends on who you ask it seems. The theories abound all over the internet. The government has released a 12 page unclassified document concerning the training objectives and areas of operation. I have included it here, though it does not really give us much more then a simple outline.
Official Release for the Jade Helm Exercise (PDF)

The opinions run from standard training exercise to preparation for martial law to  fema camps to attempts to dis-arm the American people. It could be a dry-run for any one of those (or other) scenarios, or the real thing. I believe, as do others that obama would attempt to create a situation allowing the government to institute martial law and remain in office somehow. He has shown a complete disregard for the law and our Constitutional rights thus far, I believe he sees himself as the great dictator, he has and will continue to fool himself further in the belief that he can actually become the great one. The military has performed many other training exercise throughout the country previously. So why does this training exercise have so many people concerned, and so many conspiracy theories spiraling around it?

When you consider the large area of operations, and other then Texas no specific mention of locations and the vague explanations from the government concerning the Jade Helm exercise, I believe concern is warranted. Consider the large areas of (illegally controlled state) land already under federal control, much of it remote and uninhabited. We can be assured they will utilize that fact to their advantage if they have things they want hidden from the public eye. You can see in the graphic below, the federally controlled state lands in red, according to the Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And.

That looks like a lot more then 10 square miles, for forts, arsenals and/or other needful buildings as authorized.

 

I do find the timing suspect also because the area of operation is right where many of these states are trying to regain control of their own lands from federal control.  You know the federal government never wants to cede control once they have it, you know someplace in their agenda is reasserting control over whatever lands they have illegally annexed. That we can be sure is not even close to their primary objectives though, objectives we can only guess at, if we are fortunate the exercise will be just that, an exercise.

To be continued…

 

 

 

Oh No It’s the RFRA, Cue the Left-Wing Nutjobs

A little speculation on my part…

Oh no Indiana passed a law just like 19 other states have previously. The federal government passed a similar law, it passed the House unanimously and the Senate 97-3 and it was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1993.  Nineteen states started passing their own laws when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act signed did not apply to the states.

Obama while serving in the Illinois State Senate voted on the Illinois version of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which had very similar language to the federal law. It passed the Illinois Senate 56-0 and became law on July 1, 1998.

So that leaves us with the question of why the left, who have already voted for bills just like this, are freaking out so much over this one. I’m guessing they are practicing selective memory because they need to push their agenda. With them having nothing else to really coalesce around recently, and knowing they can’t allow their minions time to think for themselves, lest support dwindle.

Of course any bill with the word “religious” in the name, no matter it’s purpose, must be anti-gay according to the left. Even if it’s not, the left takes every opportunity to push their anti-religious and Christian agenda. Too many of us still have a solid moral foundation based on our Judeo-Christian beliefs. That really bothers the left, because it highlights their weak moral fiber and hinders their agenda at the same time.

So if you see the left slip into selective memory mode, usually indicated with a feeding frenzy by the main stream media on a seemingly minor issue, they blow into a major one. Look for what they are trying to draw your attention away from. The obama administration is quite adept at using this tactic also, if one looks closely I would bet there are many ties between the players in both the administration and the media.

*Update*
It didn’t take the players on the left very long to spring into action, Gov. Malloy from Conn is signing an executive order restricting state funded travel to Indiana. San Fransisco and Seattle have taken similar action on a municipal level. They are calling it a boycott, I call it discrimination against the people of Indiana. Apparently the citizens of Indiana and the state are not allowed to exercise the right of statehood and have their own rights and freedoms that are guaranteed them as free citizens respected, because the left only believes in tolerance when you agree with them!

A Message from Anonymous

A 17 minute video from Anonymous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQzz-TpRfC4

A Problem For Every Solution

LGBTQXYZ Bullies

I have been saying since the late 1970’s what the gay agenda was about, we are unfortunately right where I feared we would end up being. Right where I warned people it would lead us, with the gay marriage issue. It’s more then that though, I saw then (in the late 70’s) that it would also be used to infringe on our religious rights and beliefs. I did not understand then what a progressive or a liberal really was, nor the danger they would become to our society and country with their narrow minded and bigoted attitudes. Had I realized back then the real danger, I would have worked harder to combat their “I hate America” agenda!

I dressed like the hippies of the 60’s and 70’s, had the long hair and the beard also. I listened to the same music, but I was conservative and in the late 70’s started to see and speak about how the 60’s would really hurt our country. I saw very little good in the “peace and love” generation and the distinctly different set of morals and values they wanted to foster on us as a nation. Many of them are our political leaders and university professors and administrators now, their socialist and/or communist beliefs and practices are paraded quite openly. Such as their use of the Cloward-Piven Strategy and constant reliance on Saul Alinsky’s last book “Rules for Radicals”, published in 1971. The gay agenda was just one more attack against our society, it was, and still is, I believe just one more tool the left (democrats) is using to re-make America, their true agenda.

I believe it would be a safe bet to say that many democrats are actually anti-gay in their private life, but their agenda comes before all else. Before honesty or integrity even, in my opinion. Most of the politicians have not had to battle too hard on this issue, there are rabid pro-gay groups that don’t care who they drag through the mud, nor if the mud is even real. Several gay organizers have come out recently concerning the tactics they have used in their fight. They have stated that they did what ever “ends justified the means” to accomplish their goal, that  goal being to legitimize an immoral lifestyle.

They show no regard for other peoples rights or beliefs, and have no problem stretching the facts or studies to match the words they are using. Accomplishing their goal, even with the negative consequences on our society, is all that matters to them. One of them admitted openly that they were indoctrinating children, and that they had no regrets in doing so. If they have to brain wash children to get them to accept their ideas and lifestyle, I’m guessing even they realize (if only sub-consciously)  that something is wrong. I believe that is part of the reason they strive so hard for acceptance of what they do, they need to legitimize it even in their own mind. Broader social acceptance helps them to quell those voices from within.

Has to be a Hate Crime!

Of course since the man is black and he was found hung and it’s in Miss, it has to be a hate crime right! If it was a white guy only the local police would probably be investigating, and thinking possible suicide. Instead the investigation involves the FBI, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and the United States Attorney’s office, and the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation. It’s almost as though they knew about it in advance, to be able to mobilize so quickly. Hmmm…

“We are calling on federal authorities to immediately investigate the hanging death of Mr. Otis Byrd to determine whether or not his death is the result of a hate crime,” Derrick Johnson, the President of the NAACP Mississippi State Conference said in a statement.

It doesn’t matter how horrid of a hate crime a black person does to a white person, it never gets called a hate crime. Yet they found this gentleman and in less then 24 hours time it’s assumed to be a hate crime and has all of those agencies involved, that quick. The local authorities should be the only ones investigating, like a normal investigation, then if they find a reason, call in other agencies as appropriate to assist. The administration and the MSM are probably foaming at the mouth hoping this is a hate crime, so they can push the “how racist America is” argument they push at every turn, even when there is no proof of racism.

54 year old Otis Byrd

His death is sad either way, I hope it’s not a hate crime, because the race hustlers and scumbags will be out in record time, trying to use it for their own benefit. They will have no respect for his family or him and cheapen everything about it just to gain as much as they can and cause as much division as possible!

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-investigating-body-of-african-american-man-found-hanging-in-mississippi-official-says/

 

To What Depths?

I saw people sharing something on facebook this evening that truly shows to what depths we have fallen as a society. I knew the whole gay agenda crap would bring us to a point like this, once people start to lower their moral standards, others with no moral fiber what-so-ever will keep pushing it further.

What I am speaking of is the fact that you can now send someone a bag of dicks (edible ones), little gummy ones. What kind of sick f**k creates something like this? One that cares about nothing but making a dollar, one that has no proper boundaries or sense of morality obviously.

I know there are people that are going to read this and think, dam dude, lighten up. My answer to them is, dam dude, grow up, develop some real values and morals and try and contribute something real to your country and the future.

Are We the People the Real Problem?

I had an idea for a post, I even started working on it, then I realized I had already done this post. I looked back in the archives and found it, I am re-posting it now. I believe it is more important and relevant now then it was when I originally posted it in January of 2013. So here it is:

We The People, Are The Problem

Huh, what? What do you mean “we the people” are the problem?

Simply put, we the American people are our biggest problem and our own worst enemy in many ways.

Why would I say that? How much does the average voting age individual know or understand about how our country works, how the economy works, how the government really works? A more important question is how much do you care?

I spend a lot of time reading about these very issues, I know from personal experience much if not all of it is hard to understand. The people involved want it to be hard if not impossible to figure out. By the people involved, I mean the government, their lackeys in the press, the lobbyists, etc…

So to get an understanding of where our country is really at means you have to really want to know, and have to put time into it.

Try this approach and see if it helps you. Start by stopping, stop looking at the issues from the point of democrat or republican. Pick an issues that is near and dear to you because chances are you already have an understanding of that issue. Do a google search on that issue, now with an open mind look at the different sites that discuss that issue. Some of those sites will agree with your point of view, some won’t, try an sift through all of that information for the truth.  That is where the open mind comes in, I have found myself to be wrong on some issues with my preconceived notions. Many of us (myself included), approach a lot of the issues from an emotional stand point, and once we form an opinion are very unwilling to change it.

In sifting through the multitude of pages your search gave you, notice which ones seem to give you more factual information and less propaganda and heart string pulls. Those are the sites you want to bookmark for future reference. I like to deal in facts, when I present facts in an article I usually will verify my data with 3 different sources. When ever possible go to the US Government websites for data, they are usually accurate, not always but 95% of the time they are. Use wikipedia only to find other sources, wikipedia is good for direction on something but the data is more often then you would think, wrong.

The first and most important step is to realize you are not always right, the second is to train yourself to find the information you need, it gets easier the more you do it.

An uninformed or low information voter as many of us are being referred to as is the biggest boon to politicians in modern politics. They know we don’t know, and they use it against us, they also pay people to find heart strings in every issue, they know that works with many of us also. They do their best to personalize an issue for us, a very effective tool for them.

Politicians only benefit by staying in office, that means getting the most people to believe what they are telling you and vote for it. Ask yourself why people get voted out of office and new ones get voted in, yet nothing seems to change in the big picture! It is because we are not armed with the truth, we have the version of the truth that fits the politicians agenda. Wouldn’t you rather have the real facts?

Where is my White Privilege?

Where is my White Privilege, or is it a pigment of my Imagination?

I want to know where I sign up for my white privilege, I sure could use the extra help right now. I am out of work on comp after getting hurt on the job. Is there a list of extra benefits due to me as a white person, or do I just develop an entitlement attitude like many in the black community have, and my white privilege will kick in? I wish I had known back in the sixties about my white privilege, I could have used it to stop my parents from getting a divorce. That would have allowed me a better opportunity to grow and develop as a normal child. It might have prevented me from stuttering every other word from the time I started talking until I was in my mid-thirties.

Or I could have engaged it in the mid-seventies to avoid committing criminal acts and ending up in a N.Y. State juvenile facility. Or a couple years later when I quit school and went to work at 16 years old. I could have used that white privilege to get a decent job, instead I worked as a bus boy and a dishwasher. If I would have had a father growing up, he could have instructed me on the proper use of my “whitpriv” my “caucasian persuasion”, my “pigment present”.

Apparently they are teaching the kids in school about white privilege now, I could have used some lessons, it might have helped me later to sidestep the drug and alcohol issues that I experienced. But then again if I had known how to use it I would have missed out on the joys I experienced in the many wonderful jobs I had over time. Jobs such as shoveling horse shit all day, or baling hay, pumping gas, picking vegetables (yes just like a migrant worker), dishwasher again, delivery person (both pizza and parts). I guess my privilege kicked in a little as I got older because I was able to get some really high quality employment then, construction laborer, bathroom and toilet cleaner, the pinnacle of success was my job answering phones all day (getting yelled at by rich people) for just over minimum wage.

The white privilege people say that because I can turn on the television or open the front page to the newspaper and see my my race widely represented, that is proof right there of it’s existence. And I thought it was because my race is the majority population, where is my common sense? Another clear indicator according to the race patrol, is the fact that I can arrange to be in the company of my own race most of the time. The majority of black people chose to live in black neighborhoods, does that give them black privilege? Most people tend to gravitate to areas with people they can identify with, by race, national origin, political agenda and even socioeconomic class. So if black or latino people want to live around other black or latino people it’s normal, but if white people want to, it’s racist.

It pisses me off to find out now in my mid fifties that I could have avoided growing up in poverty and having all of those negative life experiences, had I just engaged my “white privilege”. And apparently I lost my white privilege or it  had an expiration date on it, now that I am aware of it, I looked all over for it and it’s no place to be found. I’m thinking about putting posters up around the neighborhood, with all of the white people around some one must have seen it, hopefully it will be returned unopened and in good working order. I could really use it about now, living under the poverty level like I do.

And then there are the highly respected left wing nut jobs at the “white privilege” conference, we can’t rule out their highly evolved and advanced skill levels at rooting out white privilege in even the darkest corners of society. Fortunately they were able to make us aware of the excessive use of white privilege by Tea Party members. Who they described as having forms of racism ranging from “sort of generic to bald-faced racism”, is bald faced racism something clean shaven men practice?

According to the speaker there the Tea Party doesn’t really support “All this business about government and ‘constitutional’ it is a smokescreen that’s really all about, ‘I want this country back for me.’ And ‘me’ meaning ‘white people’. He even elaborated further on his brilliant summation by “noting that tea party supporters do not like to be called racists, the leftist activist suggested that tea party advocates mostly don’t like obama because obama “broke the white monopoly on the presidency.” Dam how did he figure out the true reason some white people don’t like obama, he broke our perfect record on old white men as president, we were trying for an even fifty. We are starting all over, it’s gonna take us another 200 years now.

And don’t forget the brain trusts he has involved in the question and answer period,a woman asked: “What is, like, an African-American tea party member? How could there be one?”

He said he doesn’t know “how people could do it” but compared black people who support limited government and gun rights to “Jewish kluxers.”

The speaker repeatedly referred to black people as “black folks.” He bizarrely suggested that “black folks” didn’t know about the tea party movement when it began because it wasn’t a topic of discussion “at the barber shop.” He also adamantly suggested that there are “no gay people in the tea party,” and that constitutional government and a free-market economy cannot coexist.

At the beginning of his talk, he had asked audience members to volunteer to speak about themselves.

“I live in the bowels of the tea party, and I have the privilege of teaching your children,” explained one White Privilege Conference attendee — a woman with a Southern accent. I am glad she went into such detail and really explained her position, we can really see where she is coming from and her true concerns.

“I teach at a very elite boarding school,” explained a second woman who said she is from the Boston area. She said the school is “full of tea partiers” who “try to, you know baptize” political opponents. This really surprises me, she happens to teach at the only elite boarding school in all of New England that is not totally liberal, what are the odds of that? And I think I have heard of the baptizing antics of the “Boston Family” of the tea party, run by “whitey”, they outfitted their enemies with rubber shoes didn’t they?

A third woman, from Minnesota, lamented that the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party is moving “towards what they call the middle” and becoming “welcoming to the needs of independent voters.” As the woman trailed off after “independent voters,” he interjected “…which means tea party,” as a way to label such voters.

A fourth woman said she attended his lecture because her “in-laws get all their news from Fox.” Michael J. Fox is not all that informative, but I guess she has her reasons. Oh, wait, I think she might mean Fox News Channel. I guess the channel her in-laws watch is as good a reason as any to be concerned about white privilege.

At least I think the lecture was about white privilege, it almost sounded more like a bash the tea Party lecture, maybe he was trying to multi-mask…