Some Black Lives Matter!

I am sure by now everyone in America has heard about the ignorance of these protestors for the “black lives matter” group. The main stream media has made sure that they have coverage of these protestors interrupting a political rally for both Bernie Sanders and Jeb Bush. The message they have for the candidates for president in 2016 is ” that they want police violence and racial disparities in policing to be acknowledged and addressed “. They supposedly wanted to disrupt a campaign event held on Tuesday in New Hampshire for Hillary Clinton, they arrived too late to gain entrance to the event they stated, though they did meet with the candidate after the event.

I would be more willing to believe that they were not allowed entrance to the event by mutual agreement beforehand, the reason for their denial into the event was room capacity had been reached. They even went as far as having the Secret Service verify that as being the reason, the fact that they went to those lengths to point it out throws doubt on it in my opinion. They were allowed to meet with the candidate afterwards in what was referred to as an overflow room. The media was not allowed to record the meeting, which is strange also, because both sides would have wanted to take advantage of the controlled situation and try to score some points with the media and the public. I believe everything was scripted here to obtain the maximum exposure while releasing the minimum amount of information.
You can read the full article here concerning their meeting: Hillary and Black Lives Matter activists meet in private.

A spokesperson/activist from Black Lives Matter told the press later “We asked the secretary about her and her family’s history with the war on drugs both at home and abroad and how she felt about her involvement in that violence that has been perpetuated, especially against communities of color and against black folks.” Yancey, the spokesperson for Black Lives Matter, added that she never heard “a reflection on her part in perpetuating white supremacist violence.”

Another clear reason a candidate would want the meeting reported in the news media, they would want to address allegations like those immediately and decisively in a public forum.
Black Lives Matter, at that point accused Hillary of ” involvement in the violence that has been perpetuated, especially against communities of color and against black folks.”  They also appear to have labeled her as ” perpetuating white supremacist violence.”

You see, if Hillary Clinton doesn’t address the statement made by Black Lives Matter, both sides win. Black Lives Matter wins, because they are seen as asking the tough no holds barred questions of the candidate. And Hillary wins because by not addressing it publicly, she appears to accept her role in these supposed crimes against the black community, her silence also helps her to appear repentant in the matter. As I stated above, I am more inclined to believe that the whole thing was scripted from start to finish, this allowed both parties to project a certain image in the situation. Yet if you notice, there was no information released by either side that has any basis in reality, such as specifics concerning violence by police, or incarceration rates for young black males. If nothing is presented, nothing can be questioned or fact checked.

I veered some from my original intentions of the article when I realized that something was wrong as reported. Under normal circumstances both Hillary (as a presidential candidate) and the Black Lives Matter group would have been fighting for press time and to score some political points.

In the next post I will cover the issues presented by the tactics and strategy  of the group Black Lives Matter.

Oh No It’s the RFRA, Cue the Left-Wing Nutjobs

A little speculation on my part…

Oh no Indiana passed a law just like 19 other states have previously. The federal government passed a similar law, it passed the House unanimously and the Senate 97-3 and it was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1993.  Nineteen states started passing their own laws when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act signed did not apply to the states.

Obama while serving in the Illinois State Senate voted on the Illinois version of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which had very similar language to the federal law. It passed the Illinois Senate 56-0 and became law on July 1, 1998.

So that leaves us with the question of why the left, who have already voted for bills just like this, are freaking out so much over this one. I’m guessing they are practicing selective memory because they need to push their agenda. With them having nothing else to really coalesce around recently, and knowing they can’t allow their minions time to think for themselves, lest support dwindle.

Of course any bill with the word “religious” in the name, no matter it’s purpose, must be anti-gay according to the left. Even if it’s not, the left takes every opportunity to push their anti-religious and Christian agenda. Too many of us still have a solid moral foundation based on our Judeo-Christian beliefs. That really bothers the left, because it highlights their weak moral fiber and hinders their agenda at the same time.

So if you see the left slip into selective memory mode, usually indicated with a feeding frenzy by the main stream media on a seemingly minor issue, they blow into a major one. Look for what they are trying to draw your attention away from. The obama administration is quite adept at using this tactic also, if one looks closely I would bet there are many ties between the players in both the administration and the media.

*Update*
It didn’t take the players on the left very long to spring into action, Gov. Malloy from Conn is signing an executive order restricting state funded travel to Indiana. San Fransisco and Seattle have taken similar action on a municipal level. They are calling it a boycott, I call it discrimination against the people of Indiana. Apparently the citizens of Indiana and the state are not allowed to exercise the right of statehood and have their own rights and freedoms that are guaranteed them as free citizens respected, because the left only believes in tolerance when you agree with them!

The last Bit of Evidence Destroyed…

They have now managed to hide any evidence of their deception in Newtown, CT with the demolition of the house alleged shooter Adam Lanza lived in. Their excuse was that several neighbors were bothered by it. With the secretive demolition of the school building and now the house, no supposed crime scenes now exist to prove anything different then the inconsistent official version of what happened that day the crisis actors and training exercise took place.

I may seem like a conspiracy theorist (my tin-foil hat is out being refurbished at the moment) but we have been lied to so many times by this administration that even the truth is suspect when it comes from them.

Taking Turns Holding the Handle! (part 1)

I get so angry many days just doing one simple thing, reading the news. In my opinion about 75% of the stuff that is trying to pass for news or information is complete bullshit. Yet for some reason people eat it up, and worse yet they share it with others. If the title doesn’t clue them in to the absurdity of the story, the story itself should. Do they ever think to actually check the facts, or wonder about the website, is it legit, propaganda or just trying to get it’s clicks to make it’s money?

America is going to hell in hand basket, and most of us are taking turns holding the handle. The biggest problem is our ego, left-wing, center, right-wing, does it matter where you stand if you can’t see the truth? I’d like to say, ask yourself honestly, but that’s the problem right there, most people can’t. We used to be a society that questioned not only ourselves, we questioned the media and most importantly we questioned our leaders. It is actually one of our responsibilities as citizens to question our leaders, too many simply just follow anymore. I have actually read statements where some people (mostly liberals) have tried to say that we should not question our leaders, that it’s not right to. These people apparently have no idea that the very foundation of our country is based on “we the people” not “we the government”.

We seem to have become a country of special interests, our own interests and absolutely no interest. This is where that ego I mentioned in the last paragraph comes in. So many people identify so strongly with, or invest so heavily in their political or personal ideals, that their ego won’t allow them to see anything else. They won’t admit they are wrong, because so much of who they are is invested in that identity that they don’t know how to be anyone or anything else. They are part of a group, they belong to something, too many (liberals) have become too weak to stand alone.

It’s truly ironic that our country was founded on the individual, our documents designed to promote and protect the rights and privileges of the individual. Each of us had the right to think and associate as individuals. Today everyone is automatically labeled and grouped (not always by choice) based simply on their thoughts and associations. Those that attempt to be an individual, to stand and be heard as one, are criticized and ridiculed with a poison and a passion I can only classify as evil by those (liberals) too weak stand alone.

 

A Problem For Every Solution

Has to be a Hate Crime!

Of course since the man is black and he was found hung and it’s in Miss, it has to be a hate crime right! If it was a white guy only the local police would probably be investigating, and thinking possible suicide. Instead the investigation involves the FBI, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and the United States Attorney’s office, and the Mississippi Bureau of Investigation. It’s almost as though they knew about it in advance, to be able to mobilize so quickly. Hmmm…

“We are calling on federal authorities to immediately investigate the hanging death of Mr. Otis Byrd to determine whether or not his death is the result of a hate crime,” Derrick Johnson, the President of the NAACP Mississippi State Conference said in a statement.

It doesn’t matter how horrid of a hate crime a black person does to a white person, it never gets called a hate crime. Yet they found this gentleman and in less then 24 hours time it’s assumed to be a hate crime and has all of those agencies involved, that quick. The local authorities should be the only ones investigating, like a normal investigation, then if they find a reason, call in other agencies as appropriate to assist. The administration and the MSM are probably foaming at the mouth hoping this is a hate crime, so they can push the “how racist America is” argument they push at every turn, even when there is no proof of racism.

54 year old Otis Byrd

His death is sad either way, I hope it’s not a hate crime, because the race hustlers and scumbags will be out in record time, trying to use it for their own benefit. They will have no respect for his family or him and cheapen everything about it just to gain as much as they can and cause as much division as possible!

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-investigating-body-of-african-american-man-found-hanging-in-mississippi-official-says/

 

Where is my White Privilege?

Where is my White Privilege, or is it a pigment of my Imagination?

I want to know where I sign up for my white privilege, I sure could use the extra help right now. I am out of work on comp after getting hurt on the job. Is there a list of extra benefits due to me as a white person, or do I just develop an entitlement attitude like many in the black community have, and my white privilege will kick in? I wish I had known back in the sixties about my white privilege, I could have used it to stop my parents from getting a divorce. That would have allowed me a better opportunity to grow and develop as a normal child. It might have prevented me from stuttering every other word from the time I started talking until I was in my mid-thirties.

Or I could have engaged it in the mid-seventies to avoid committing criminal acts and ending up in a N.Y. State juvenile facility. Or a couple years later when I quit school and went to work at 16 years old. I could have used that white privilege to get a decent job, instead I worked as a bus boy and a dishwasher. If I would have had a father growing up, he could have instructed me on the proper use of my “whitpriv” my “caucasian persuasion”, my “pigment present”.

Apparently they are teaching the kids in school about white privilege now, I could have used some lessons, it might have helped me later to sidestep the drug and alcohol issues that I experienced. But then again if I had known how to use it I would have missed out on the joys I experienced in the many wonderful jobs I had over time. Jobs such as shoveling horse shit all day, or baling hay, pumping gas, picking vegetables (yes just like a migrant worker), dishwasher again, delivery person (both pizza and parts). I guess my privilege kicked in a little as I got older because I was able to get some really high quality employment then, construction laborer, bathroom and toilet cleaner, the pinnacle of success was my job answering phones all day (getting yelled at by rich people) for just over minimum wage.

The white privilege people say that because I can turn on the television or open the front page to the newspaper and see my my race widely represented, that is proof right there of it’s existence. And I thought it was because my race is the majority population, where is my common sense? Another clear indicator according to the race patrol, is the fact that I can arrange to be in the company of my own race most of the time. The majority of black people chose to live in black neighborhoods, does that give them black privilege? Most people tend to gravitate to areas with people they can identify with, by race, national origin, political agenda and even socioeconomic class. So if black or latino people want to live around other black or latino people it’s normal, but if white people want to, it’s racist.

It pisses me off to find out now in my mid fifties that I could have avoided growing up in poverty and having all of those negative life experiences, had I just engaged my “white privilege”. And apparently I lost my white privilege or it  had an expiration date on it, now that I am aware of it, I looked all over for it and it’s no place to be found. I’m thinking about putting posters up around the neighborhood, with all of the white people around some one must have seen it, hopefully it will be returned unopened and in good working order. I could really use it about now, living under the poverty level like I do.

And then there are the highly respected left wing nut jobs at the “white privilege” conference, we can’t rule out their highly evolved and advanced skill levels at rooting out white privilege in even the darkest corners of society. Fortunately they were able to make us aware of the excessive use of white privilege by Tea Party members. Who they described as having forms of racism ranging from “sort of generic to bald-faced racism”, is bald faced racism something clean shaven men practice?

According to the speaker there the Tea Party doesn’t really support “All this business about government and ‘constitutional’ it is a smokescreen that’s really all about, ‘I want this country back for me.’ And ‘me’ meaning ‘white people’. He even elaborated further on his brilliant summation by “noting that tea party supporters do not like to be called racists, the leftist activist suggested that tea party advocates mostly don’t like obama because obama “broke the white monopoly on the presidency.” Dam how did he figure out the true reason some white people don’t like obama, he broke our perfect record on old white men as president, we were trying for an even fifty. We are starting all over, it’s gonna take us another 200 years now.

And don’t forget the brain trusts he has involved in the question and answer period,a woman asked: “What is, like, an African-American tea party member? How could there be one?”

He said he doesn’t know “how people could do it” but compared black people who support limited government and gun rights to “Jewish kluxers.”

The speaker repeatedly referred to black people as “black folks.” He bizarrely suggested that “black folks” didn’t know about the tea party movement when it began because it wasn’t a topic of discussion “at the barber shop.” He also adamantly suggested that there are “no gay people in the tea party,” and that constitutional government and a free-market economy cannot coexist.

At the beginning of his talk, he had asked audience members to volunteer to speak about themselves.

“I live in the bowels of the tea party, and I have the privilege of teaching your children,” explained one White Privilege Conference attendee — a woman with a Southern accent. I am glad she went into such detail and really explained her position, we can really see where she is coming from and her true concerns.

“I teach at a very elite boarding school,” explained a second woman who said she is from the Boston area. She said the school is “full of tea partiers” who “try to, you know baptize” political opponents. This really surprises me, she happens to teach at the only elite boarding school in all of New England that is not totally liberal, what are the odds of that? And I think I have heard of the baptizing antics of the “Boston Family” of the tea party, run by “whitey”, they outfitted their enemies with rubber shoes didn’t they?

A third woman, from Minnesota, lamented that the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party is moving “towards what they call the middle” and becoming “welcoming to the needs of independent voters.” As the woman trailed off after “independent voters,” he interjected “…which means tea party,” as a way to label such voters.

A fourth woman said she attended his lecture because her “in-laws get all their news from Fox.” Michael J. Fox is not all that informative, but I guess she has her reasons. Oh, wait, I think she might mean Fox News Channel. I guess the channel her in-laws watch is as good a reason as any to be concerned about white privilege.

At least I think the lecture was about white privilege, it almost sounded more like a bash the tea Party lecture, maybe he was trying to multi-mask…

The Atomic Face Palm

I am sure I will sound racist, because you can’t bring up race issues without being a racist if you are white. But I just can’t believe sometimes the things I read that liberals think and actually say out loud. Some liberals are complaining because in a majority black neighborhood, police are stopping more black people then white people. Police are actually searching more black people then white people in a majority black neighborhood.

This is totally unfair, I think we should start busing in more white criminals, as we did with the schools years ago, to achieve a greater balance. We can even streamline the process and have the bus go directly to the local police precinct, once there the police can figure out what tickets or charges would most benefit the statistics and act accordingly to create more of a balance in these neighborhoods.

I have to stop myself from reading what the liberals have to say, between face-palming and beating my head against the wall, my head is starting to hurt all the time. There is an upside, the cat stopped reading over my shoulder, even she was amazed by the liberal stupidity and she can’t even read, but she threw out a paw from face-pawing, so she won’t read that crap anymore

Feline Face Paw-mmm

Grow a Pair and Get Some Integrity

I really wish the democrats would grow a pair and just be honest about their feelings and intentions on the 2nd amendment. It’s called having integrity isn’t it, when you are honest about things. I know I am just acting plain crazy to expect politicians to be honest, especially the democrats.

What has me up in arms right now is the completely dis-honest and deceptive attempt to ban the M855 green tip ball ammo used in the AR-15 sporting rifle. I believe you can combine all previous administrations since America was formed and not match the level of lies and deception practiced by the obama administration.

The ATF, I am sure is acting on direct orders from the white house in pursuing the attempted ban on this ammo. They can’t get what they want through legislation, which is to take all of our guns away, or at least restrict us to weapons we cannot protect ourselves with from a tyrannical government. I have to wonder how many people the administration is paying just to look for back door methods to violate our rights, that is all this ban is. The ammo in question does not qualify as armor piercing ammo by law as described in the U.S. Code, 18 U.S. Code 921 (17) (a) –

(A) The term “ammunition” means ammunition or cartridge cases, primers, bullets, or propellent powder designed for use in any firearm.

(B) The term “armor piercing ammunition” means—

(i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium; or

(ii) a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile.

(C) The term “armor piercing ammunition” does not include shotgun shot required by Federal or State environmental or game regulations for hunting purposes, a frangible projectile designed for target shooting, a projectile which the Attorney General finds is primarily intended to be used for sporting purposes, or any other projectile or projectile core which the Attorney General finds is intended to be used for industrial purposes, including a charge used in an oil and gas well perforating device.

The fact that this ammunition does not meet the requirements by law to be considered armor piercing doesn’t seem to matter to the ATF or obama. When your intentions are to violate our rights, for your own anti American purposes, honesty and integrity don’t enter into the equation. But then where does any integrity enter into it with this administration?

Of course many democrats are urging the ATF to move forward with this illegal ban to “keep dangerous ammunition out of our neighborhoods”. Even law enforcement sources stated that there is no real danger to them from this ammo, which was the reason for the ban according to the ATF. That is because criminals don’t carry AR-15 rifles, and the AR platform pistols that are available on the market are to costly and large for the normal criminal element to purchase or conceal. Take a look and see:

• Bushmaster – AR pistol $1,228.98/23.5 to 26.75 inches long
• Rock River Arms – AR pistol $1,175.00/ 23.0 to 26.5 inches long
• Black Rain Ord – AR pistol $1,197.00/ 32.0 inches long

I only listed 3 here, but if you do some research you will see all of the AR platform pistols all fall into the same general price range and size range. Neither the price nor size is attractive to your average criminal, they can’t conceal them as they can a compact or even mid-frame handgun. Most of the guns recovered by police (used in crimes) are revolvers in.38 caliber and semi-auto handguns in calibers of .22, .32, .380 and .9mm most often. They are purchased on the street for $500.00 or less usually.

The ATF and obama’s decepticons in the administration are simply trying to cause a shortage in the supply and/or cause a spike in the cost of ammo for the AR-15 sporting rifle. They won’t admit their real purpose, but they fear this weapons platform because of it’s popularity with certain segments of the population that the administration does not trust. Truthfully this administration cares nothing about our constitutional rights and would like to totally dis-arm the populace if they could. Too many in our government, especially democrats would like to re-make our country into a police state, so they may have complete control based on a socialist system, not as a constitutional republic as we have now.

I suspect, as do others that the ATF and administration are not done with this yet. They will try an even larger ban most likely, all under the guise of safety for law enforcement. The DOJ has thrown law enforcement to the wolves multiple times, but now that they can use them for their own purpose they are suddenly concerned with their safety. obama and his band of liars and thieves only care about their own agenda and how to accomplish it.

D.H.S Funding

The republicans in the house have actually done their job for once, they are trying to de-fund obama’s amnesty action with the bill to fund homeland security. The democrats in the senate are holding it up though. The problem is if the bill doesn’t pass, our border patrol agents may not get paid after this week. And it may allow as many as 5 million illegals to get social security numbers, and the administration is trying to give them retroactive tax credits for up to four years worth up to $24,000 each. That is our tax money obama and the democrats are trying to give away to criminals.

I believe obama has multiple goals in mind here, trying to create additional democratic voters with these illegals. He is also trying to push us further into debt and create more financial problems to break the government, see Cloward & Piven and you will understand. I believe the third goal is to create more of a divide in the country.

No matter what the administrations goals are here, they are breaking the law even in allowing these illegal aliens to remain in our country. How many laws do they need to break and ignore before the house and senate do their job and put a stop to this lawlessness?