Jade Helm, just an Exercise?

Most of us are aware of the Jade Helm exercises that are going to be happening starting July 15 and running until September 15. For those of you that are unaware, it is a joint effort with the Green Berets, Navy Seals, the 82nd Airborne Division, USAF Special Operations Command, USMC Special Operations Command and expeditionary units each participating in the exercise. The exercise will cover Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah and Colorado, with Texas and Utah being designated as “hostile territory” and New Mexico leaning towards hostile.

Jade Helm Operating Area

Is this just a training exercise or something more, that depends on who you ask it seems. The theories abound all over the internet. The government has released a 12 page unclassified document concerning the training objectives and areas of operation. I have included it here, though it does not really give us much more then a simple outline.
Official Release for the Jade Helm Exercise (PDF)

The opinions run from standard training exercise to preparation for martial law to  fema camps to attempts to dis-arm the American people. It could be a dry-run for any one of those (or other) scenarios, or the real thing. I believe, as do others that obama would attempt to create a situation allowing the government to institute martial law and remain in office somehow. He has shown a complete disregard for the law and our Constitutional rights thus far, I believe he sees himself as the great dictator, he has and will continue to fool himself further in the belief that he can actually become the great one. The military has performed many other training exercise throughout the country previously. So why does this training exercise have so many people concerned, and so many conspiracy theories spiraling around it?

When you consider the large area of operations, and other then Texas no specific mention of locations and the vague explanations from the government concerning the Jade Helm exercise, I believe concern is warranted. Consider the large areas of (illegally controlled state) land already under federal control, much of it remote and uninhabited. We can be assured they will utilize that fact to their advantage if they have things they want hidden from the public eye. You can see in the graphic below, the federally controlled state lands in red, according to the Constitution Article I, Section 8, Clause 17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And.

That looks like a lot more then 10 square miles, for forts, arsenals and/or other needful buildings as authorized.

 

I do find the timing suspect also because the area of operation is right where many of these states are trying to regain control of their own lands from federal control.  You know the federal government never wants to cede control once they have it, you know someplace in their agenda is reasserting control over whatever lands they have illegally annexed. That we can be sure is not even close to their primary objectives though, objectives we can only guess at, if we are fortunate the exercise will be just that, an exercise.

To be continued…

 

 

 

A Message from Anonymous

A 17 minute video from Anonymous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQzz-TpRfC4

Be Aware and Vigilant

I believe we can expect multiple terrorist attacks in the United States in the very near future. obama is not very bright in my opinion, but he has people working in the background that have been planning. Our open border is paramount to getting the right people into the country.

These people (terrorists) will, through bombings or large scale attacks at malls or similar locations will create terror and fear among the populace.
The FBI, DHS, etc… will conveniently not have any intel in advance to stop the attacks, even though the government is monitoring pretty much all electronic communications in the country.

The administration will use these attacks to scare people into wanting to accept their goal for a national police force. The excuse being that with better cooperation at every level, these attacks can be stopped. But the only way to get that cooperation needed to protect the people is with one police force from coast to coast.
There are currently only approximately 500,000 people in law enforcement across the country at the federal, state and local level. I believe we will will start seeing a drastic increase in those numbers in the near future also.

That is also the reason for the attacks on our second amendment rights, there are too many of us that are armed for the government to take our guns away. Since their efforts at legislation have failed, and operation choke point came to light, they have attacked the ammo supply for the AR-15, in the hopes of causing shortages in supply.

Be aware and vigilant people, obama only has 2 years left for whatever he plans, I believe things will escalate quickly since his administration has failed in a lot of their attempts so far.

Looking Under the Rock of No-Knock

I did a blog article about how obama (and others) want a national police force (for control). I think I understand now the how and why of all of the no-knock raids. I now realize that many in law enforcement want the same thing, it gives them more money, more power and absolute protection from the public. This is the only explanation I can see why they would continue to put officers in danger with these raids that are completely unneeded. I would bet that if you start looking into the background of the officers doing the actual shooting, you will find they most likely are liberal democrats, they have been promised no prosecution, backed by DOJ probably (at the highest level). Possibly rewarded with other things also like promotions, back-door cash payments, etc… Just a theory but…

Common sense tells us that a minor drug crime does not need a no-knock raid unless it has another purpose. They could pick him up as he leaves the house or work with less officers and less danger to all involved, that’s a no f**in brainer to us normal people. So we need to look behind the scenes and ask ourselves what is really going on? I find it hard to believe all of these police officers and departments are this stupid, unless they have other motives!

This is going on to push us (we the people) into wanting a different system of policing, pretty convenient that obama comes out with his plan right now isn’t it?

This is a perfect example of what I am talking about, I am sure this kid was picked because they knew no weapons were present, so no danger to officers going in.
http://thefreethoughtproject.com/peaceful-man-shot-killed-botched-drug-raid-drugs-guns/

I have found conflicting reports as to there being marijuana present, even if there was, it does not justify a no knock raid of this nature.

I keep hearing about the safety of the officers, what about the safety of the public from these trigger happy people hiding behind a badge.

The Plot (bullshit) Thickens

Some of you may have noticed the propaganda coming from the government lately concerning people on the right. They want to demonize people like the Tea Party and pretty much anyone that is conservative if they can. They want us to believe that some people on the right are a greater threat then radical islamic terrorists can be to America.

I’m talking about sovereign citizens, these are people that don’t accept the authority of the government in their lives. I personally have never met one of these people, nor has any one I know.

Of course CNN tells stories with no real proof, they want us to believe there have been 24 attacks since 2010 from these sovereign citizens. That is what they report, but can only cite one such incident, and it was by an ex-employee of the TSA, that sounds more like a disgruntled employee then anything else. Their big source is the southern poverty law center, which is a far left wing organization that considers any one on the right to be a danger. All you have to do is believe in your constitutional rights and you are a danger according to them.

I have supported the Tea Party since it’s inception, simply because I believe in limited government and that the government has a responsibility to be fiscally responsible with our tax dollars. Every conservative that I know understands that we need a government for our country to function properly, none of us is anti-government. We just want our government to do the job we sent them to Washington to do.

Most importantly, we want them (the government) to respect our constitutional rights, the rights they have a responsibility to protect. Yet our current administration spends more time, money and effort trying to strip us of our rights then they do anything else. In turn they label any one that speaks out against them and their efforts as a domestic terrorist or at the very least anti government.

They have infiltrated every level of government from the federal level right down to local government. They want to, and are re-writing our history through common-core, white privilege and critical race theory in education at all levels from primary through secondary level.

I never thought being an American Patriot would be seen as a bad thing, but that is what the left and our current administration are trying to do. They are trying to make what is good and right seem wrong, and their perverted and demented immoral behavior into the norm.

 

Turning the Thin Blue Line Black

There is a lot going on in America concerning law enforcement lately. From the grand jury decisions in the Michael Brown and Eric Garner cases to the use of the federal 1033 program to militarize local law enforcement agencies, there is much to be concerned about. Of major concern is the unbelievable and drastic rise in the use of Swat style raids, even for minor infractions of the law. Though it’s not readily apparent, it is all connected in my opinion. Some of you may think I need to put on my tin foil hat here, but I believe my theory is more real then conspiracy. How many of you have heard obama’s remarks about wanting his own national police force equipped just like the military?
Listen for yourself:

Let me list a few things here, and then I will connect the dots between them and the formation of a national police force, under the thumb of the Washington elites.

• Federal government agencies (DOJ, FBI, etc…) tasked with enforcing the law, protecting the criminals over the victims.
• Fusion Centers – http://www.dhs.gov/state-and-major-urban-area-fusion-centers
• Federal 1033 Program: Supplying local law enforcement with military weapons and equipment. http://www.dispositionservices.dla.mil/leso/pages/jointhe1033program.aspx

The federal government can have a big affect on state and local law enforcement agencies through the policies and actions of the DOJ, FBI, HLS and ICE at the federal level, and they can cause a lot of frustration and anger by using the courts at all levels. Look at the affect of illegal immigration, or the release of violent felons (illegals) that were released back into the general public. Local police threatened if they detain or arrest many of these people.

The people that want a national police force understand one important factor that must considered. In this whole equation, the rank and file majority of law enforcement officers across the country would have to join in the effort to create this force, for it to work. There are approximately 12,500 police departments with approximately 500,000 employees in the United States. Each one of these departments have their own unique chain of command, internal politics, rules and standards that vary by department size and type. Over coming the problems created by trying to merge all of these people into one organization would be almost impossible.

The answer to this problem is to create a want and perceived need at each level of law enforcement. This is where the federal 1033 program comes in, this is the first taste of what could be. And it is easy to draw the prey (officers) into the trap, they offer all of these new toys to play with at no charge. Military grade weapons and equipment will be needed down the road, so in this manner they get the officers to learn the weapons and equipment voluntarily. Due to the nature of their job it is easy to convince officers that they need this equipment, step one accomplished.

Now we start phasing in these fusion centers, you need to click the link here to read the stated purpose of these centers: http://www.dhs.gov/state-and-major-urban-area-fusion-centers.

This is step two, bring together different law enforcement agencies under one roof, start giving them a little bigger taste of what could be, still at no charge of course (it’s on us, the taxpayer). One of the other purposes is to start trying to standardize the procedures by which all law enforcement agencies operate, new procedures will of course be called suggestions to streamline operational objectives and goals (get everyone on the same page). And promote higher levels of inter-agency co-operation.

Many of us are concerned about the drastic increase in two important developments in law enforcement, those are the rise from several thousand Swat type raids each year to over 40,000 each year currently. The other development is the increased use of force as a first reaction by many officers, the main excuse is officer safety. It is clear from video and eye witness accounts that much of this force was not justified in many cases. The government is encouraging the Swat type raids through the issuance of high levels of military hardware (1033 program), once they have the equipment they will want to use it. They want as many officers experienced in these types of home entry as possible, possible future gun confiscations will require large numbers of officers to be skilled in these tactics. By encouraging tactics like this, officers in both urban and rural departments are all learning standardized methods.

Another major concern is the court approved hiring of less qualified individuals, lower I.Q. applicants being accepted over more intelligent ones. The excuse being that more intelligent people would lose interest in the job and move on to a new career, thus wasting training time and money. The reality is quite different I believe, in truth the purpose is to fill the ranks with people that will question less and simply follow orders as instructed. The obvious problem of constantly hiring people with lower intelligence is the upper ranks will eventually fill with these people through promotions. This will not be an issue if the shots are being called by a group of people say in Washington maybe, instead of at a local level.

I mentioned creating a want earlier in this article. Look at what a lot of state and local governments and police departments seem to be doing with policies and attitudes that are dramatically affecting officer moral. They are being aided by the media in this also, consider how quickly the media shut up about the lack of use of the national Guard in the Ferguson situation. The media brought it up, but quickly dropped it because their masters told them to. How was officer moral affected knowing no one had their back in that situation. By slowly breaking down moral over time they are creating a problem that they will promote later as being solved by consolidating police departments on a national level. Demoralized officers will have interest in this because they will be shown how it will benefit them, of course officer safety will be promoted highly as one of the greatest benefits involved. Step three accomplished, how many officers will  volunteer because they have been convinced it is in their best interest? Because one department with common goals will better protect them, not just on the job but in retirement also. Creating the us against them environment, where the public is the enemy is also aiding in creating the “want” that will help push police officers towards the one department idea.

Ask yourself who really benefits from the protests against the police that are happening around the country. What do they do to officer moral? They clearly give the impression to police officers that bigger is better when it comes to dealing with protests and possible civil unrest. Who can offer bigger and better then a coordinated federal police force.

Just something to think about…

 

Oliver Twist(ed) Friedfeld’s Story!

Bad Language Warning: Because this pisses me the fuck off beyond belief! I couldn’t believe this was a real story at first!

What the fuck is wrong with this Oliver Twist(ed) Friedfeld moron? And he may be part of our government someday. Though the government is already filled with the same level of stupidity exhibited by this Oliver Twist(ed) fool. He deserved to get robbed because of his privilege, he says he believes that those with privilege should just adapt to crime. This time his assailants were not violent, what of the many who are mugged and beaten, or raped, stabbed or shot in the commission of a crime of this nature? What the fuck is wrong with this guy?

Not once did he consider their attackers to be bad people. “They wanted my stuff, not me. While I don’t know what exactly they needed the money for, I do know that I’ve never once had to think about going out on a Saturday night to mug people. I had never before seen a gun, let alone known where to get one.” I don’t know who or what decides who is privileged or not privileged or at what level privilege kicks in. But it is quite clear that this individual is completely clueless to the reality that many of us live, and the sorrow and pain many families experience because violent crime has taken a loved one away from them.

He can hardly blame his assailants because of income inequality, and some bullshit of otherization. They were two criminals that robbed him and his room mate at gunpoint. But it’s not their fault that they are the garbage of society, it’s the wrongs of the past, according to Oliver Twist(ed). He doesn’t, like all liberal morons mention any specific wrongs of the past that need addressing. But these wrongs are clearly having an effect on these poor gun toting young men of high moral fiber, who’s investment in the local crack house did not pay off with any dividends this quarter. Thus forcing them to create a temporary level of privilege for themselves, based on someone else’s hard work and effort.

Apparently this Oliver twist-ed has wealthy parents or family, this has allowed  him to live a life of privilege. One that has afforded him all the comforts of life, and an education most can only dream of. An education that clearly has taught him nothing of the real world, yet through the School of Foreign Service he may someday be a member of the State Department, possibly in control of important decisions concerning our country. I have to assume that it is his privilege that has gotten him to this point in his life, it certainly is not his grasp on reality, he has none. I am guessing he has never gotten off of his over privileged ass and done a day of work in his life, he clearly has no idea that someone in his family had to earn the money that he is coasting through life on.

He trots out the old income inequality excuse for the two scumbags that robbed him.  How fucking clueless is this guy? Who makes excuses for the criminal, especially criminals that commit armed robbery. This just really pisses me off, what kind of schools and teachers do we have in our country at all levels of the education system if we are turning out complete morons and idiots like this. Someone could have been injured or even died during the robbery if things had gone differently.

This is a big part of what is wrong with America, we have people telling us that all white people are racists because of privilege (white privilege), just by virtue of birth. We have liberals like this idiot Oliver twist-ed telling us that some people because of their social and or financial privilege should not expect to have the same protections or rights the Constitution and the Bill of Rights guarantees the rest of us. Even more disturbing is the idea that criminals are not responsible for their own behavior, but some perceived wrong from the past is the real culprit. So we should do what? Grant to the criminal element in our society special rights to make them a privileged class, based on some yet unstated past wrongs the liberals all agree exist yet cannot to this day ever seem to make an actual list of.

I know this sounds totally ridiculous and insane, but to me this whole story from Oliver twist-ed sounds that way. After reading it multiple times I still can’t grasp that this is a true story, it sounds like a script for a TV show more then reality. The worst part of it all is there are way to many clueless liberals and morons in our society, that don’t seem to grasp reality. If you try to rob me at gun point or break into my house I am going to shoot you, plain and fucking simple, that is all the reality you need to grasp. You won’t be the first one to take a shot at me, but I will do my best to make sure it is your last shot, ever. How do you expect someone to respond if you are threatening their life or their family?

I still cannot grasp the reality here, that reality being where our country and society are headed. It’s not even about the number of people that have fallen victim to the liberal garbage corrupting our society. It’s the fact that they can spread this garbage so easily through their control of the education system, both primary and secondary. That is what is making their agenda so effective is the total control, common core is an extension of that agenda. Why do you think they (the liberals and democrats) are pushing so hard for universal preschool, an earlier start to the indoctrination of our children. How do you think the system is turning out morons that believe they deserved to be a victim.

Why do you think common core and total control is so important to them. They know with time and control of the circumstances they can eventually teach kids to give up their Constitutional Rights and Freedoms voluntarily, without a fight or shot ever being fired. This may seem like a story of just another clueless moron not grasping the reality many of us face in life. But look at the underlying cause and effect that the education system probably played here.

And yes privilege did and does play a role here, but not in the manor you think. Many of the people that end up running our country and our government, come from families of wealth and privilege. Many of these people already have a distorted sense of reality because of their life of privilege and how it shelters them from a normal daily life in America. If they can influence the future leaders and people in government, it is a much smaller group that they need to focus on. With exclusive and Ivy League schools attended primarily by the people they most wish to influence, consider where this could eventually lead us. And see why they need these schools to be the bastions of liberalism they have become.

Consider what we can learn from this story, as fucked up as it is.

A Different Focus, Current Dangers, Future Crises…

I have tried to look at many different issues from across the political and social spectrum over time. The problem is there are so many important issues facing our society right now, no one person or blog could cover them all and do justice to them. So I have decided for the current and near future I am going to focus on three or four main issues, they are “our 2nd Amendment rights”, “the muslim problem”, “the militarization of the growing police state” and “financial collapse and/or civil unrest”. I want to focus on these issues because they have the potential, at some point in the future (near future), to become actual physical conflicts. There are other issues that could lead us into a physical conflict also, I will touch on them as they will relate to other issues. So much of what is happening in our country is the cause or affect of something else.

Of course I sound like a conspiracy nut when I start talking about physical conflicts on the streets of America. Too many people have convinced themselves that it can’t happen here, not in a million years. Unless things change considerably in the near future (couple of years), I believe that it can and will happen. Even without looking at any specific issues or situations, ask yourself why the federal government has been, and continues to, purchase large amounts of weapons and ammunition. Weapons and ammunition for departments and agencies that have no real need for them, nor any enforcement powers that would allow them to utilize these weapons. Couple that with the sheer volume of military hardware being given to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies under the DOD’s 1033 program. Initially authorized under the NDAA in 1990, the programs scope was strictly authorized as a new tool in the “war on drugs”. The program was expanded considerably a few years later to include material that could be used in “the execution of law enforcement activities”. That’s pretty dam vague isn’t it? Then of course 9/11 and the Patriot Act helped to expand the program and the distribution of even more equipment and weaponry.

Now add into the mix the new Fusion Centers being set up, these centers bring together federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, under one roof. My biggest concern with these centers is how they are being used. Information has come out already that shows that they are more concerned with watching and labeling patriotic Americans as a terrorist threat, then they are concerning true terrorist activity. Their list of dangerous people includes the Tea Party, Oathkeepers, Three Percenters and basically anyone that believes in their Constitutional Rights and Freedoms.

So far we have not even looked at any real issues, only at the past and present behavior of the federal government. It leaves you questioning and wondering what they are preparing for in the future, near or far. No other administration in our history has felt the need to arm every government agency in the executive branch. Nor have any previous administrations attempted to bring together federal, state and local law enforcement, while at the same time choosing which laws to enforce and which to ignore. At the same time intentionally breaking the laws concerning immigration and the security of our national borders.

I am going to start presenting articles focused primarily around the four issues I listed above. While you are waiting, consider what I have brought up concerning the federal government, and start doing your own research. You may realize I am not as much of a conspiracy nut as I may have first appeared to be.

Three Percent of What? Mr. Government Agent…

I read an article that left me with several questions. I have always thought the purpose of writing an informative news article was to in fact “inform” your readers. The author never seemed to see the basic flaw in the article, or was helping to promote propaganda and negative word association from the government.  The article in question by Chris Eger, is from June 2014 and was posted on Guns.com, here is a link:
http://www.guns.com/2014/06/10/chicago-police-atf-form-intelligence-center-to-fight-three-percenters-video/

Some background is required here or you may not see the flaw either, depending on your level of knowledge concerning history, and current events also. The opening paragraph of the article is as follows:
“The Chicago Police Department, working with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and FBI, has opened the Crime Gun Intelligence Center to crackdown on illegal guns from what they call “three-percenters.”

It continues farther down:
“The target of this Crime Gun Intelligence Center: a group the ATF is referring to as “three-percenters.”

And even farther down in the article:
“It remains constant from year to year that about 40 percent of the crime guns recovered in the City of Chicago come from Illinois, and about 20 percent come from Indiana,” Carl Vasilko, ATF Special Agent in Charge, told WGN. “The core mission of the Crime Gun Center is to identify these shooters, or these ‘three percenters,’ and the traffickers that sell them guns and get them off our streets.”

In all three of these sections of the article they make sure to mention (with emphasis) what they are referring to as “Three Percenters”. They cast them in a very evil light, yet they never validate or qualify, if you will, what or who exactly is a “three percenter”. This is not by accident, this was not a simple omission in an article, by where an author later says “oh crap” I forgot to define who or what a “three percenter” is, or what behavior or actions qualifies them to be a “three percenter”.

This is a simple negative word association game being played by the federal government to give a negative, even criminal connotation to the name “three percenter”. For those of you unfamiliar with the term “three percenter”, you have to travel back to the American revolution. During the American Revolution, the active fighting forces in the field against the crown, never amounted to more than 3% of the population of the colonies.

In today’s society there are different groups of people that refer to themselves as “three percenters”, in reference to the original colonists that were fighting the tyranny of the king. The people in these 3% groups are basically just like Tea Party members, pro-constitution, pro 2nd amendment, etc… Of course the government sees them as a threat, so they are trying to make the negative association through articles such as the one I reference here. If you read the whole article at the link above, no place in there does it says what or why they are using the term “three percenters”. Quite clearly they are trying to build a negative association in the mind of the reader.

Of course the Anti-defamation league and the southern poverty law center have listed the 3%’ers since 2009 and 2010 as a radical right wing organization. But then again the SPLC lists anyone that is even mildly conservative as a radical right wing extremist. They basically are a propaganda organization, nothing more.

It is the state and federal government that bother me with their classification of the 3%’ers as an extremist organization. They know full well that they are spreading outright lies, but this administration is the most dis-honest in American history. The 3%’ers, of which I am a member, have very valid reasons to mistrust our current government, we are all aware of the NSA spying on innocent citizens who simply believe in their constitutional rights and freedoms. There is an old joke that unfortunately is not a joke with this administration, how can you tell obama is lying, his lips are moving. This used to be a joke, but the obama administration is filled with true scumbags and liars, on a scale unprecedented in our history.

Three Percenters are true Patriots concerned with the present and the future of America. We support the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as they are written, not as the liberal scumbags wish to interpret them. We believe in freedom for all Americans and understand that personal responsibility as citizens and fiscal responsibility by the government are two of the key measures needed to bring America back to it’s former glory. We are not anti-government as many wish to portray us, we support the government as a responsible entity, not in it’s current incarnation. The administration hates us as they hate any true American that can see who they really are.

I like most 3%er’s are military veterans, we took an oath, to fight all enemies foreign and domestic, my oath expires with my death, not before. As long as I breath I will bleed for America, for you, your family and your freedom!

Here is a youtube video that will help you understand what a 3%er really is!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqjlfIZLmsE&sns=fb

 

It’s Almost That Time!

It’s almost that time, time to vote again. Another chance to help affect change in our country, to feel like we are doing our part, our civic duty. This raises the question of “what are civic duties”, or more appropriately “what are our civic duties as an American citizen”? I think the answer you get will differ greatly from person to person, and most of them will be wrong. I make this statement with confidence in it’s validity, having watched many of the videos posted online asking our college students and the average American simple questions about current and past American history or events. An even greater indicator is the actual state of our society.

So what are these “civic duties and responsibilities” I keep going on about here? I know some of you have no idea what I am talking about.

Assuming that you accept the concept that “we the people” have a responsibility to be loyal to our country and our government, and in turn our government has a responsibility to protect our life, liberty, rights and freedoms. It is through this concept that we derive our civic duties and responsibilities, some of our duties come with a legal obligation attached.
Such as:

• Obeying the Law – This includes traffic laws also.
• Jury Duty – Everyone I know that has been called for jury duty has done their best to be excused from it. I have been called twice, both times they seated a jury before I was selected, bummed me out, I wanted to serve, it’s one of my civic duties.
• Paying Taxes – I don’t enjoy paying taxes, but I do understand the need for them. I didn’t appreciate as a Tea Party member the I.R.S combing through my records for political reasons, but that is part of the breakdown I am talking about.
• Voting – Voting as we all know is not required by law, but it is a duty we have as citizens. Politics affects every second of your life, even as you sleep. Voting is a duty, voting knowledgeably is a responsibility.
• Military Service – (listening for the uproar) Okay Military Service is not a duty (it is a civic responsibility), I add this because I believe it should be a civic duty. I believe every citizen should serve between 1 and 3 years service to their country. Imagine the rise in high school graduation rates, the drop in crime rates, poverty levels and unemployment levels across the country. We would have a better educated society and one that understands civic duty first hand. My service in the U.S. Navy changed my life for the better.

A civic responsibility is something we do out of a sense of obligation to ourselves and our country. In a truly patriotic society what is considered a civic responsibility is clearly defined and accepted, as it used to be in our society. The liberal agenda coupled with political correctness has distorted and warped many of our American traditions and civic responsibilities. Civic responsibilities, past and present include:

• Military Service – A once proud tradition for many, it is still considered an honor to serve by the more patriotic Americans.
• Government Service – Many people work in civil service jobs as a way to feel that they are fulfilling a responsibility to their country. In the past this was more common, but I believe most current government employees have taken the job simply because of the pay and benefits. With a pay rate approximately 30% higher then their civilian counterparts.
• Politics – The first group of people are those with a very strong sense of civic responsibility, they have pursued becoming a politician to serve the public trust and help to protect our rights and freedoms. (cue derisive laughter)
  The second group are those that have helped by working on a political campaign, feeling that this would be substantial enough to satisfy their sense of responsibility.
  The third group are those that become actively involved in the political process as either an advocate and representative of the people (independent), fighting to protect our rights and freedoms. Or they become an active member of one of the two major political parties, and become part of an agenda and philosophy.

One of the greatest civic responsibilities you could share with others was volunteer work in the community. Americans used to excel at this, more so then any other nation. Through our churches, schools, neighborhood community centers and organized charitable organizations, we gave much in time, money and effort to our favorite charities and causes. Our civic and social (moral) responsibilities were an integral part of our daily lives as individuals and as a community.

Christians and conservatives still do their best to adhere to the tenets and the values that our sense of duty and responsibility spring from. The liberals and democrats have drifted so far from any moral base, that in many democratically controlled cities and towns they have passed laws and regulations prohibiting many charitable actions. They have made it illegal in some places to help house, cloth or even feed homeless people. They either want to make as many people totally dependent on government as possible (look into cloward & piven strategy), or they have no compassion what-so-ever.

Their agenda clearly shows they have abandoned all sense of patriotism and tradition, in doing so I believe they have also sacrificed their morality. I believe they have also sacrificed something even greater, something the value of, they no longer can appreciate. Our traditions and charitable works are built upon this as is our ethics and our morals. What I am speaking of is the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the rights and the freedoms that are protected by the rule of law in these documents have allowed us to become a country of tradition and charity.

The liberals and democrats are violating the greatest civic duty and responsibility of all. They refuse to  accept their responsibility to help safeguard and protect our rights and freedoms. Their current agenda seeks to deprive and violate, not protect and promote, they have no problems using lies and deceit, win at all costs. Though we may not understand the end game to which they play. I don’t believe they understand the true consequences of their actions.

Though no one advocates for violence, do they think “we the people” will go quietly if they try to take our freedom of speech, or religion? They need to understand we would use our guns in defense of our rights before we would allow anyone to try and confiscate them. Does the leftist elite think they would somehow be immune to the consequences. The government does not have nearly enough people to take by force that which we will not give up willingly.