Let Them Say it Better!

I was working on an article about the Ferguson riots, I decided to share these two videos instead, they say a lot of things that really need to be said. They are more of an expert on the black community then I am.

Here is a black guy named Charles R. Patrick, he has something to say…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpsQwl_19M4

Here is a really pissed off black guy named Jonathan Gentry, he says “shut up black people, I’m going to tell you what you need to hear, not what you want to hear”.

http://viral.buzz/furious-jonathan-gentry-telling-you-what-you-need-to-hear-must-watch/

I have stated in the past that the majority of the problems and the issues in the black community can only be solved by the black community. I know there are black people that see the reality of the situation, I’m glad some of them are starting to speak out. They may be ignored and called uncle Tom’s at first, if enough speak out and start calling it like it is, maybe some real changes can be initiated.

Here is a little humor, that makes a point about the situation also…

Did you hear about the method the police found to break up the riots and protests in Ferguson, apparently it works very effectively, they are dropping job applications on them from helicopters…

Weather Worn

Hello everyone, I am back, I got a little weather worn, I live right outside Buffalo, N.Y. and got slammed with over 5 feet of snow at my house. This is what my truck looked like the other day, just a little of the antenna left sticking out of the snow. Give me little bit and I will have a post concerning the situation in Ferguson, thanks.

A Different Focus, Current Dangers, Future Crises…

I have tried to look at many different issues from across the political and social spectrum over time. The problem is there are so many important issues facing our society right now, no one person or blog could cover them all and do justice to them. So I have decided for the current and near future I am going to focus on three or four main issues, they are “our 2nd Amendment rights”, “the muslim problem”, “the militarization of the growing police state” and “financial collapse and/or civil unrest”. I want to focus on these issues because they have the potential, at some point in the future (near future), to become actual physical conflicts. There are other issues that could lead us into a physical conflict also, I will touch on them as they will relate to other issues. So much of what is happening in our country is the cause or affect of something else.

Of course I sound like a conspiracy nut when I start talking about physical conflicts on the streets of America. Too many people have convinced themselves that it can’t happen here, not in a million years. Unless things change considerably in the near future (couple of years), I believe that it can and will happen. Even without looking at any specific issues or situations, ask yourself why the federal government has been, and continues to, purchase large amounts of weapons and ammunition. Weapons and ammunition for departments and agencies that have no real need for them, nor any enforcement powers that would allow them to utilize these weapons. Couple that with the sheer volume of military hardware being given to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies under the DOD’s 1033 program. Initially authorized under the NDAA in 1990, the programs scope was strictly authorized as a new tool in the “war on drugs”. The program was expanded considerably a few years later to include material that could be used in “the execution of law enforcement activities”. That’s pretty dam vague isn’t it? Then of course 9/11 and the Patriot Act helped to expand the program and the distribution of even more equipment and weaponry.

Now add into the mix the new Fusion Centers being set up, these centers bring together federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, under one roof. My biggest concern with these centers is how they are being used. Information has come out already that shows that they are more concerned with watching and labeling patriotic Americans as a terrorist threat, then they are concerning true terrorist activity. Their list of dangerous people includes the Tea Party, Oathkeepers, Three Percenters and basically anyone that believes in their Constitutional Rights and Freedoms.

So far we have not even looked at any real issues, only at the past and present behavior of the federal government. It leaves you questioning and wondering what they are preparing for in the future, near or far. No other administration in our history has felt the need to arm every government agency in the executive branch. Nor have any previous administrations attempted to bring together federal, state and local law enforcement, while at the same time choosing which laws to enforce and which to ignore. At the same time intentionally breaking the laws concerning immigration and the security of our national borders.

I am going to start presenting articles focused primarily around the four issues I listed above. While you are waiting, consider what I have brought up concerning the federal government, and start doing your own research. You may realize I am not as much of a conspiracy nut as I may have first appeared to be.

Now A little Comic relief…

I love this video, I crack up every time I see it, so thought I would share it.

“I don’t need sub-titles!”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6pWvxnii2I

Three Percent of What? Mr. Government Agent…

I read an article that left me with several questions. I have always thought the purpose of writing an informative news article was to in fact “inform” your readers. The author never seemed to see the basic flaw in the article, or was helping to promote propaganda and negative word association from the government.  The article in question by Chris Eger, is from June 2014 and was posted on Guns.com, here is a link:
http://www.guns.com/2014/06/10/chicago-police-atf-form-intelligence-center-to-fight-three-percenters-video/

Some background is required here or you may not see the flaw either, depending on your level of knowledge concerning history, and current events also. The opening paragraph of the article is as follows:
“The Chicago Police Department, working with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and FBI, has opened the Crime Gun Intelligence Center to crackdown on illegal guns from what they call “three-percenters.”

It continues farther down:
“The target of this Crime Gun Intelligence Center: a group the ATF is referring to as “three-percenters.”

And even farther down in the article:
“It remains constant from year to year that about 40 percent of the crime guns recovered in the City of Chicago come from Illinois, and about 20 percent come from Indiana,” Carl Vasilko, ATF Special Agent in Charge, told WGN. “The core mission of the Crime Gun Center is to identify these shooters, or these ‘three percenters,’ and the traffickers that sell them guns and get them off our streets.”

In all three of these sections of the article they make sure to mention (with emphasis) what they are referring to as “Three Percenters”. They cast them in a very evil light, yet they never validate or qualify, if you will, what or who exactly is a “three percenter”. This is not by accident, this was not a simple omission in an article, by where an author later says “oh crap” I forgot to define who or what a “three percenter” is, or what behavior or actions qualifies them to be a “three percenter”.

This is a simple negative word association game being played by the federal government to give a negative, even criminal connotation to the name “three percenter”. For those of you unfamiliar with the term “three percenter”, you have to travel back to the American revolution. During the American Revolution, the active fighting forces in the field against the crown, never amounted to more than 3% of the population of the colonies.

In today’s society there are different groups of people that refer to themselves as “three percenters”, in reference to the original colonists that were fighting the tyranny of the king. The people in these 3% groups are basically just like Tea Party members, pro-constitution, pro 2nd amendment, etc… Of course the government sees them as a threat, so they are trying to make the negative association through articles such as the one I reference here. If you read the whole article at the link above, no place in there does it says what or why they are using the term “three percenters”. Quite clearly they are trying to build a negative association in the mind of the reader.

Of course the Anti-defamation league and the southern poverty law center have listed the 3%’ers since 2009 and 2010 as a radical right wing organization. But then again the SPLC lists anyone that is even mildly conservative as a radical right wing extremist. They basically are a propaganda organization, nothing more.

It is the state and federal government that bother me with their classification of the 3%’ers as an extremist organization. They know full well that they are spreading outright lies, but this administration is the most dis-honest in American history. The 3%’ers, of which I am a member, have very valid reasons to mistrust our current government, we are all aware of the NSA spying on innocent citizens who simply believe in their constitutional rights and freedoms. There is an old joke that unfortunately is not a joke with this administration, how can you tell obama is lying, his lips are moving. This used to be a joke, but the obama administration is filled with true scumbags and liars, on a scale unprecedented in our history.

Three Percenters are true Patriots concerned with the present and the future of America. We support the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as they are written, not as the liberal scumbags wish to interpret them. We believe in freedom for all Americans and understand that personal responsibility as citizens and fiscal responsibility by the government are two of the key measures needed to bring America back to it’s former glory. We are not anti-government as many wish to portray us, we support the government as a responsible entity, not in it’s current incarnation. The administration hates us as they hate any true American that can see who they really are.

I like most 3%er’s are military veterans, we took an oath, to fight all enemies foreign and domestic, my oath expires with my death, not before. As long as I breath I will bleed for America, for you, your family and your freedom!

Here is a youtube video that will help you understand what a 3%er really is!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqjlfIZLmsE&sns=fb

 

Don’t Break Your Child!

I’m sorry I did not get to write an article, but things are finally settling down in my life and smoothing out. I did find an article I felt compelled to share though. It touched a nerve in me, I grew up without a father, and never had children, so I can’t understand how a parent can do this. If I was lucky enough to have a son or daughter, I would so encourage them in everything they did. I have seen too many children broken by their parents, it’s very sad. So here is an article very worth the read.

http://www.danoah.com/2010/09/you-just-broke-your-child.html

 

Computer Problems

Sorry I did not get a chance to put out anything, had my computer hard drive shit the bed. I had to set up a dual boot on a new tower for windows 7 and linux. Hopefully I will get something out soon.

Dam Sexist, Racist Tea Partiers Screwed it Up!

Those dam sexist, racist Tea Party and GOP bastards, totally screwed up and nominated Mia Love for the 4th congressional district in Utah, they then screwed it up even worse by supporting her through out her campaign thus allowing her to beat her democratic opponent, Doug Owens. This allows her to become the first Haitian American and first black female Republican ever elected to Congress.

If that wasn’t bad enough then the Tea Party screwed up more and supported Tim Scott, the junior United States Senator for South Carolina a republican, and the first African-American senator from the state of South Carolina, and the first elected from the South since 1881.

The republicans also nominated Shelley Moore Capito the first female Senate candidate to be elected in West Virginia’s history, and the first Republican elected to the Senate from West Virginia in 48 years.

So I can see where the tea Party and the Republicans really screwed up, and accidentally created these historic election results. Since we know from the democrats how sexist and racist they are.

The important question is when are people going to start talking about race and the race relations problems we have in America? I have brought it up on multiple occasions, from different perspectives in hopes that someone would take the first step and start a dialogue. Oh wait, that’s what I did.

 

Is That Your race Card or Mine?

Warning this article may contain material and opinions offensive to liberals and democrats. This incident apparently is considered a “controversy” by the left wing (nut jobs). The recording and statements made appear to show that a black person can play the race card then lie about it and the liberals still stand behind them. They in fact will take it even further and build a controversy around it where none existed.
Go ahead and call me racist and get it out of the way now. I am not racist, but like a lot of white people I am sick of hearing about the race card, it’s been played so much by some people it’s become a joke. The left will keep playing it as long as it works to keep the black community playing along as the victims. I have to be honest the majority of white people I know don’t really care about race, it’s about who you are.

I started writing this article about a statement that Daniele Watts made at the University of Southern California, School of Law. At first glance I thought I was just pointing out what I thought to be a some what ridiculous statement. Then I realized there was more to it, much more, part of an obvious agenda by certain individuals and the USC School of Law.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with Daniele Watts, she is an actress, I had never heard of her until the incident with the LAPD in which she was involved. Apparently it is being considered the Daniele Watts Controversy by people on the left.

If you listen to the police recording of the incident, the real controversy here is Daniele Watts, 35 seconds into the conversation with LAPD police officers she throws the race card out there. She then becomes argumentative, uncooperative and outright rude and starts swearing. Listen for yourself to the audio here from TMZ (2:51 the highlights):
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/daniele-watts-actress-allegedly-mistaken-prostitute-heard-arguing-police-audio-article-1.1939813
or the long version (23:56)
http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-actress-daniele-watts-questioned-by-lapd-audio-20140915-htmlstory.html

The officers were investigating a legitimate call that came into the department concerning lewd behavior in the vehicle they were in. So they were not singled out for harassment by the LAPD as she alludes to “Do you know how many times the cops have been called … just because I’m black and he’s white,” she’s heard saying.

I have to say, after listening to the recording she definitely has some serious issues, she is either one of the biggest drama queens out there, or like many blacks takes on the role of  a professional victim on demand. Her acting skills could be very handy here.

Listen to how clueless she is and outright lies in this statement: “He didn’t even give me the respect of telling me what happened,” she told CNN. “For me, if he would have come to me like ‘excuse me ma’am, you seem like a respectable person but someone made a call can we just talk to you for a second,’ the whole situation would have been different.”
The officer clearly stated to her why they were there, also if she has been stopped for being black so many times as she states, she would know police officers don’t approach a situation like that. She also would know not to walk away from a police officer while being questioned and expect no consequences.

What really set me off on this was the original incident, and the “controversy” that followed. Here is someone who is totally ignorant and rude and if she was white would have been charged with something and arrested. I have give the officers credit for maintaining their composure dealing with her and her victim mindset.

Moving along, let us look at the circus this turned into, and the really out there statements made on Nov 3 by Daniele Watts at the University of Southern California School of Law. There they held a conversation with Daniele Watts and featuring Professors Michelle Gordon, Shana Redmond, Camille Gear Rich, and Diana Williams. Titled “Race, Sexual Expression, and Civil Rights Law: A Conversation about the Daniele Watts controversy.” How does law frame or challenge social understandings or perceptions of interracial intimacy?

They put her on this panel, they don’t explain what her field of expertise is. Earlier I thought it was either drama queen or professional victim, after her recent statements I definitely have to go with victim.

Here are some of her statements from the panel on Nov 3rd:

Daniele Watts tearfully explained Monday  how racially charged events nationally and her own history with alleged racial profiling caused her to “explode” at a police officer in September.

“At a certain point, enough is enough and somebody has to say something,” Watts said. She referred to this year’s police shooting of Michael Brown, an unarmed black man, in Ferguson, Mo., and to witnessing her father being profiled when she was 16.
I’m can’t seem to make the connection between her and Michael Brown, who lived 1,834 miles from her. He also lived a much different reality then she did.
And she is still traumatized by witnessing her father allegedly being profiled when she was 16, we are to believe that she has not been able to deal with this for 13 years now, she is currently 29 years old.

This one really gets me,
“Watts said she hoped the panel discussion at USC would drive the broader societal conversation about race forward”.
She is so concerned with the conversation about race, it only took her 35 seconds to play the race card, when approached by police officers.

She even trotted the old standard we haven’t heard in years from the left:
“If we’re going to condemn me, then we also have to look at the entire society that I am a product of”.
The old blame society trick, I haven’t seen them use that in a while now, I guess it’s coming back in vogue.

Hoping to post later…

I hope to post something later, I have been under the weather, that’s the problem with just being an American trying make a difference. I don’t have a staff to help me out. I have to get out and vote, then I will try and put together an article. Have a good day everyone…